|
rockfordpi
|
 |
« on: March 05, 2010, 02:47:06 AM » |
|
You make the call, brought to you by the American Duck Hunters Association...
Working out of each of the following formations, #73, Lee Ziemba, our starting Left Tackle, goes three yards downfield and catches a forward pass. In Which of these formations, if any, is #73 Lee Ziemba an eligible reciever.
Formation 1
73 79 50 66 77 80 81
87 18 75 44
Formation 2
84 68 79 50 66 77 80
18 82 73 44
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aukooze91
Fierce Tiger
  
Posts: 161
Ed Dyas, Auburn FB & K, 1958-1960
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2010, 06:20:22 AM » |
|
I assume he would have had to report in to the ref due to his jersey number. Nevertheless, imo he is eligible in formation 2 and not 1.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We've got a chance to do something great." - Cam Newton.
|
|
|
|
AuburnSoldier
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2010, 08:44:14 AM » |
|
I say eligible in both. He is uncovered in the first- 80 is ineligible. He is in the backfield in the second, so he should be eligible there. I could be wrong on both.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"...I believe in Auburn, and love it."
|
|
|
|
walker77
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2010, 09:09:36 AM » |
|
Have to communicate to ref that he will be eligible...# issue... Then, eligible in both... That is my final answer... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today & forever!
|
|
|
|
GoCrazyAuburn
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2010, 11:48:07 AM » |
|
yea the issue is his number, those 70 numbers are linemen numbers so he wouldn't be eligible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
EasyBake15
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2010, 07:03:31 PM » |
|
With Kodi back there in this formation, Ziemba better be blocking. A WR who can't throw throwing to a lineman is not the best combination haha
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I got ice in my veins, blood in my eyes. Hate in my heart, love in my mind. I've seen nights full of pain, days of the same. You keep the sunshine, save me the rain.
|
|
|
|
Jansterz71
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2010, 07:21:25 PM » |
|
yea the issue is his number, those 70 numbers are linemen numbers so he wouldn't be eligible.
^^^^^This^^^^^ even if you talk to the ref befor game It doesn't matter, he does not have a recievers jersey number on
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STLEAGLE
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2010, 09:49:16 PM » |
|
He is eligible in both as long as he reports to the official, which makes someone else in the formation ineligible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jansterz71
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2010, 11:33:39 PM » |
|
He is eligible in both as long as he reports to the official, which makes someone else in the formation ineligible.
Nope
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AUMed
Tiger Cub

Posts: 36
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2010, 11:34:58 AM » |
|
He is too close to the center on the first formation.. I'm pretty sure you can't be an eligible tackle ever... in that I mean that if D. Adams lined up at tackle in the formation he wouldn't be eligible either.
The second one he is eligible if he reports to the umpire/ref.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Feldenak
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2010, 11:55:17 AM » |
|
Rule 1, section 4: players with numbers between 50-79 and 90-99 are never eligible receivers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jansterz71
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2010, 12:28:28 PM » |
|
Rule 1, section 4: players with numbers between 50-79 and 90-99 are never eligible receivers
this it does not matter if you talk to ref, jeez
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rockfordpi
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2010, 06:18:37 PM » |
|
Ok, now that the poll is closed, here is the answer. While only 5% of the people who voted in the poll got it right, several people posted with the correct answer.
#73 in not eligible in EITHER formation (or any formation), regardless of whether he checks in with the ref or not. Players wearing numbers 50-79 are always ineligible. This is in spite of the fact that we had #73 Lee Ziemba line up at wideout or flanker on numerous occasions last year.
These results were much better than that in the previous poll regarding 5 men on the Line of Scrimmage when only 10 players are on the field.
I will post another question when I have more time...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
walker77
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2010, 06:40:53 PM » |
|
Good questions so far, keep them coming...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today & forever!
|
|
|
|
STLEAGLE
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2010, 11:51:23 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|